Google Chromecast, Kindle Fire and iPhone

I used to use a micro-HDMI to HDMI cable to watch Amazon Prime Streaming videos and youtube videos from our Kinds Fire HD as well as the Toshiba Excite 10-inch tablet. Somehow the cable stopped working, but even when it worked the process was convoluted. It was time to "upgrade" to Google Chromecast HDMI Streaming Media Player.

I got the Google Chromecast for less than $33, shipped. And despite my reservations about how easy the setup would be on our secure WiFi network, it actually worked like magic. Apparently, in the beginning of the setup process, the Chromecast does not try to connect to your WiFi router (for which it would need to know the WiFi password/key), but rather lets the Chromecast app connect to it directly and then lets you enter the WiFi password in the app.

But I am getting ahead of myself.

The Chromecast is a little HDMI dongle-like device. It comes with everything you need: HDMI extension cable in case you need to either reposition the Chromecast for better WiFi reception or to let you connect it so another HDMI jack nearby could be used, a USB cable to provide power to the Chromecast from the TV's USB jack or from the supplied AC-to-USB power adapter.

Since our Panasonic Viera TC-L32C3 32" IPS LCD TV has two HDMI jacks next to each other, I had to use the supplied short HDMI extension cable. And since the TV lacks USB, I connected the USB cable to the supplied AC power adapter.

The WiFi connection was super-stable even through a couple of concrete walls. I did have to move my TP-LINK TL-WR841N Wireless N300 WiFi Router slightly further from the wall.

The setup was a breeze, sort of. As mentioned before, I had to download the Chromecast App for Android and use it for entering the WiFi password and renaming the Chromecast. But after that, I could easily send Youtube videos from either the Toshiba Excite 10-inch tablet or the iPhone 5. But I cannot find the official Youtube app for Kindle Fire HD and Amazon Instant Videos (Amazon Streaming) doesn't work on Chromecast either. Netflix should work though.

I then enabled my Kindle Fire HD to install apps from sources other than Amazon and downloaded the official Android Youtube app. I think it means I "sideloaded" the Youtube app from the Internet. Now, I can easily send Youtube videos from the Kindle Fire HD as well. It even turns the TV on if it is off or switches to the HDMI input where the Chromecast is attached automatically when you select to cast to the Chromecast from the Youtube app.

Casting from Netflix

Streaming from Netflix works flawlessly. Not only is the playback responsive to commands (e.g. pause/resume), the picture quality is amazing in 1080p. While streaming Breaking Bad, you can see every little imperfection on the face of the main character.

Casting from the Browser

You currently cannot make videos from internet play on Chromecast from Chrome on mobile devices, only from computers.

It is frustrating Amazon doesn't support the device natively. But at least now I can send some youtube videos to my TV from the iPhone, queue them up and my son can enjoy a few of hist favorite cartoons on the big screen with excellent picture quality and without me having to deal with cables.

You can send Youtube videos from your iPhone or Android device to Chromecast (and consequently to your TV) to be played, pause and control the playback of those videos, add them to the TV queue, manage the queue and even play videos from the Chrome browser (with somewhat worse quality though).

Using Chromecast with Windows Phone

It used to be impossible. I got a Nokia Lumia 521 Windows Phone. Chromecast could not be cast to from this phone - the Youtube app provided by Microsoft didn't have the "cast" button and was, in fact, a wrapper around a mobile version of the Youtube web site.

But things changed. Now there is an app that lets you watch Youtube videos on your TV using Chromecast, Read my review of TubeCast.

Bottom Line

The Google Chromecast is excellent and easy to use. Not only does it let us watch Youtube and Netflix videos on our TV with no messing with cables, but it does so in excellent quality and lets us control the playback with a variety of devices. We use an iPhone 5, Android-based Toshiba Excite tablet and Kindle Fire HD to control it, plus even a Windows Phone 8.1. And certainly there will be more apps coming soon. I highly recommend this device if you don't have a smart TV.

Thank you, Google!

Kindle Fire Software Update Causes Streaking, Tiling, Strange Behavior When Scrolling

Starting approximately 12/13/2013, my Kindle Fire HD started behaving strangely when scrolling through web pages in its Silk web browser. The part of the page would get stuck and the new part would "accordion" over it, like a tile. It is difficult to explain, but very annoying.

I suspected a hardware problem or a software one. I was considering resetting the device and, failing that, getting a new one, but did some online searching and discovered that this issue started to happen about the same time for others using various Kindle Fire devices (HD, HDX, 7 and 8.9 inch size).

It appears that a recent software update is the culprit and Amazon is working on solving this issue. In the meantime, you can enable direct software installation and download/install Chrome or Netscape Navigator.

Update 12/26/13: my Kindle Fire HD fixed itself. Apparently a software update resolved the issue that was introduced by a previous automatic software update. Nice.

Pulse and Glide in Honda Accord Automatic

After achieving 39 mpg in our 2007 Honda Accord automatic without doing anything special, aside from using Marvel Mystery Oil in gas, watching the speed and doing a couple of things from my post on maximizing fuel efficiency, I decided to try "Pulse and Glide", a.k.a. "Burn and Coast".

The idea behind P&G is simple: the engine is more efficient at moderate throttle openings at moderate RPMs. There are so-called brake-specific efficiency maps for every engine, and the ones I saw show that the maximum efficiency was reached at RPMs close to the torque peak at throttle openings of 40-80%.

Pulse and Glide involves accelerating at moderate-to-high throttle in highest gear possible (to keep the engine in the most efficient range, close to its torque peak) and then, ideally, shifting into neutral. Then coasting for a while and repeating the process. So instead of driving, say 50 mph, accelerate to 55, coast to 45, repeat.

Some people even switch off the engine during coasting, but this is unsafe as the power assist in steering and brakes is lost.

The easiest application of the P&G is in a car equipped with manual transmission. Since the driver has a full control over the gear selection, you can push on the gas pedal almost all the way to get maximum efficiency at a high gear without the transmission downshifting. In the automatic transmission equipped cars, one has to be careful to just enough pressure on the gas pedal so that the transmission does not downshift.

Also, I have reservations about shifting into neutral in an auto-equipped Honda Accord. While some cars are purportedly safe to do so, the others aren't. Furthermore, I am not willing to conduct experiments that might result in a failure of a part that costs thousands to fix and would result in hassle and time lost.

As a result, here is my experiment: apply P&G for one tank of gas as follows:

1. Accelerate moderately
2. Coast with the transmisision in "Drive"
3. After the speed decreases 5-10 mph, repeat.

While not the most efficient P&G method there is, I suspect I might be able to finally get over 40 mpg. Stay tuned.

Update #1: I was unable to mostly drive in the manner described above for the first tank of gas and as a result got 34.7 mpg. I will try again with the next tank.

Update #2: Not really getting good results with this approach. Switched to mild drafting behind trucks instead :)

Another record - 39 MPG in 2007 Honda Accord

I am using the Marvel Mystery Oil again, in our 2007 Honda Accord. A while ago I got 38.5 MPG in out 2006 Accord, and a similar MPG number in the 2007 Accord. But now I deflated the tires back to factory-recommended 30-32 psi. Conditions: mostly long trips and about 10% A/C use. I would say about 90% highway at 55-65 mph.

I drove using techniques I outlined in my post on maximizing fuel economy, but with no tire overinflation. I added about 4 oz MMO to fuel (per 15 gallons).

I added the Marvel Mystery Oil (MMO) to the tank and filled it up with regular 87-octane gas. This time I drove 546 miles before refueling and refueled with 14 gallons of gas, averaging 39 MPG. This MMO test included a couple of short trips and about 10% of time I also used A/C. Without those, I probably would be able to get to 40 MPG. And I expect MMO to keep the fuel system clean, even when using semi-questionable (not "top-tier") gas. I will give MMO another try in my 2004 Infniti G35. The previous attempts did not achieve much.


My web site

TP-LINK TL-WR841N Wireless N300 WiFi Router

I have recently replaced a 802.11g WiFi router with the TP-LINK TL-WR841N Wireless N300 Router . The reason was the fact that my old WiFi router didn't have enough range to reach through several concrete walls into our other bedroom. More importantly, its WiFi connection was somewhat unstable, resulting in pauses when using Skype over WiFi.

I decided to upgrade the router and get better range, more stable connection and not spend a lot of money. As a result, I got the TP-LINK TL-WR841N for $20 or so, shipping included. Not only was it super-easy to install and use, it comes with a 2-year warranty.

The router supports 802.11b/g/n standards, has the latest security features, including WPA2 encryption that I use. It has 4 wired Ethernet 10/100 ports and dual antennas.

I am happy with this router's stability, range, ease of use and unobtrusive design. The periodic connection dropouts in the WiFi are no longer happening. Ditto the Internet connection resets. Highly recommended.

Honda Accord - Change your power steering fluid

We have two Honda Accord cars; a 2006 and a 2007 models. Both developed a slight occasional squeak when turning the steering  wheel at around 6.5 years of ownership; one at 39K miles and another at 66K miles.

Although the power steering fluid change is not in the maintenance schedule or the manual, apparently it needs to be done. I pumped out the original fluid using the turkey baster and replaces with the OEM Honda Power Steering Fluid, closed the reservoir, started the car and turned the wheels left and right a few times. Then I stopped the car and repeated the process.

The first few reservoir-fulls of the fluid were coming out very dark and dirty-looking. After several refills, the fluid became much clearer. I used four 12-oz bottles of fresh fluid for each car. The squealing is gone and the steering seems slightly lighter.

Unlike other cars that use ATF for power steering fluid, Honda uses their own formulation. Make sure you only use genuine OEM Honda fluid. Also, make sure you cover the areas around the fill hole of the reservoir with a towel, especially the serpentine belt and the pulleys.

Another thing to remember: a lot of quick lube places will take the used power steering fluid for recycling. It needs to be disposed of properly. I took my used PS fluid to a local quick-lube place.

P.S. In my 10-year old Infiniti G35 the steering made no sound and the fluid still looked clean, but I replaced it anyway with Redline ATF fluid.

15-thousand Mile Mobil 1 EP Experiment

While our 2007 Honda Accord's oil life monitor (OLM, a.k.a. Maintenance Minder) signals that the motor oil has 0% life left at about 7,500 miles, I wanted to try if I could extend this interval by a factor of two. Mobil 1 Extended Performance motor oil is guaranteed to 15K miles in normal conditions, within one year. This is exactly twice the OCI (oil change interval) that the Accord requests using regular, mineral motor oil.

The oil filter should already be able to handle 15K miles (per Honda it needs to be changed once in 2 oil changes). But I will use a more robust Bosch Distance Plus filter just to be safe.

Accumuilating 15K miles will take me close to a year, Stay tuned for results.

Beware of OEM codes when buying tires!

I recently discovered that the highly-rated (by Consumer Reports, Tire Rack and people who own them) Michelin Primacy MXV4 tires don't grip well in case of my 2004 Infiniti G35. Some time squeal in turns and during braking later and after some due head scratching, I think I found the issue.

Apparently the tire size I got (P215/55R17 93V) has a "T" code, which means it is designed for Toyota and therefore is optimized for Toyota Camry. So I shopped for a well-rated tire and got a Prius tire instead, unwittingly. That is quite lame.

There is a lesson here. If you are shopping for an aftermarket tire, make sure you don't get a tire with an OEM designation other than for your own car. As for my situation, the tires are smooth, provide comfortable ride and excellent fuel economy. So I will moderate my driving a bit and make sure I don't have them squeal in turns and under braking.

The price of low rolling resistance - Michelin Primacy MXV4

About a year ago I replaced Yokohama YK520 tires on my 2004 Infiniti G35 with highly-rated Michelin Primacy MXV4. Both tires carry a V speed rating. I am running comparable inflation pressures and noticing that the grip level of the Michelins is nowhere near as good as that of the YK520.

This is surprising for several reasons. First of all, the Michelin Primacy MXV4 is highly rated, in comparison to other tires in its class, bu Consumer Reports, Tire Rack and people who use them. And I already have several thousand miles on them, which should mean that they are broken-in and the mold release compound should have worn off. Perhaps the problem is the tire in the size I got (215/55R17) is a Toyota-spec OEM tire and is potentially tuned more for longevity, comfort and MPG rather than grip.

The fuel economy is noticeably improved in comparison with the Yokohama YK520. But the tires squeal when coming to an abrupt stop or when taking turns at speeds that my Honda Accord's mediocre Bridgestone Turanza EL41 tires stay largely silent.

Is this the price of low rolling resistance and, by extension, better fuel economy? I will keep looking for an answer.

Review of Garmin nuvi 2555LMT 5-Inch GPS Navigator with Lifetime Maps and Traffic

I have used the Garmin nuvi 2555LMT 5-Inch GPS Navigator with Lifetime Maps and Traffic for several months now. It is quite good, but has some issues you should be aware of. This GPS as well as the same model with a 4.3-inch screen were Consumer Reports "best buys", and that is the reason I bought it.

I used to have a 3.5-inch CRT TV-like Garmin c320, that not only looked unappealing and had a small screen, but it also stopped working in my car after I installed the DVR/camcorder. When I bought this Garmin nuvi, I was happy that it worked and locked onto GPS signals faster than the c320.

Mounting

Also good was the mounting hardware. Not only is this navigator thin and modern-looking, its mounting hardware (suction cup and the bracket) are sturdy and easy to use. Additionally, the screen is large, bright and informative. The 12V power cable has a built-in receiver for the traffic information.

On another hand, the suction cup keeps coming off. I might have to get another mounting device, e.g. a friction mount.

Some Features

The Garmin nüvi 2555LMT comes with lifetime map updates and free lifetime traffic. It has features like junction view, lane guidance, split view of map/junctions, speed limit display in some areas.

In Use

First off, the reception is quite good and the signal is obtained faster than that of the previous GPS devices I used. The directions are easy to follow and the traffic alerts are visible at all times. The ETA (estimated time of arrival) takes into account traffic conditions en route. And if you want to go around the traffic, you are presented with choices and estimated times. Nice.

The sounds and markings are informative. The route calculation and re-calculation is pretty fast, but not very much so. It takes several seconds. The 5-inch screen is huge, bright and informative.

The Garmin nüvi 2555LMT powers up when you turn the car on and turns off when you turn it off, so that is nice and unlike the stupid TomTom One (or is it Tom Tom?), which you have to turn on and off yourself.

Traffic Information

The traffic information works at times and sometimes there is a traffic jam on the freeway and you are stuck in it, but the GPS shows you "all clear". In other words, the data may be out of date. Still, it is better than nothing.

Speed Limit Information

This is quite problematic. On one the part of the freeway I take almost daily and where the speed limit has been 55 mph for at least several years, the GPS tells me that the speed limit is 45 mpg, for a good 2 miles. On some streets in Irvine, where the speed limit has been 55 mph for at least 6 years, it states that it is 45 mph or 50 mph. And, worse, in some areas where the limit is 45 mph, it claims that it is 50 mph. So it is accurate to +/- 10 mph, and as such worse than useless.

Bottom Line

This Garmin nüvi 2555LMT is an excellent GPS as long as you don't rely on its speed limit guidance and do not expect the traffic information to be very accurate. Its lane guidance and junction view came in handy many times. I use it all the time and highly recommend it.

Gateway LT LT4010U PC Netbook - Inexpensive and Versatile, But Has Issues

We bought the Gateway LT LT4010U netbook for my mother-in-law to take with her to China so that she could use Skype and probably use the Internet as well. For only $178 plus tax it was less than what I spend on groceries most days going to Costco (grainted "groceries" includes single-malt Scotch or a case of Pinot Noir).

As a result of its low price, I didn't expect much but was pleasantly surprised. In this day and age of the tablet (we have a couple of tablets at home), who needs a netbook? Excellent question.

While the tablets are great for consuming content, netbooks (and other things with keyboards) are better if you need to create content. In other words, if you have to type a lot. But in our case, we just wanted something that is easier to use for someone who is 65 years old with no computer skills. Sounds counter-intuitive? I won't go further into the reasoning, but will concentrate instead on this netbook.

With its Intel Atom N2600 processor, Windows 7 Starter and 320 GB hard drive as well as a camera above its 10.1-inch LED-lit screen. Its 3-cell battery is good for several hours of activities (your mileage may vary).

It comes with a power adapter that will work in any country (110-240V) and has a detagacble plug so that you can purchase a plug for another country.

It comes with Windows 7 Starter preinstalled and I used Vistallator to switch most of it to Chinese (simplified Mandarin). After installing Skype, the netbook's camera worked flawlessly and now my mother-in-law uses Skype on this neetbook in China. She also became addicted to Internet. Thanks, Gateway!

Annoyances

The  keyboard has flat buttons that are difficult to distinguish by touch and "F" buttons as well as some others need to be accessed while holfing the "(Fn)" button, which is plain stupid. The touchpad is ok, but instead of two buttons for left and right click functionality, there is only one long button that can detect which side of it you "click". Problem is it is needlessly too stiff.

There was Norton (Symantec) backup 30-day trial software preinstalled that bugged me every day with offers to activate itself. It was not easy to get rid of.

Pros: Low price, camera for Skyping, etc., low power consumption
Cons: Keyboard not for those who need to type a lot, stiff touchpad bar

Bottom Line

This netbook will not win any speed contests. In fact, running more than one application at a time is definitely taxing it. But to leiserly browse the web or use the Skype, it is more than sufficient. And for much less than $200, it is a steal.

Shark Super Chrome Double Edge Safety Razor Blades - Much Better Than Fusion

After using electric shavers for decades and achieving less than perfect shave, I decided to try Gillette Fusion. That resulted in fast and close shave, but irritation. I have a combination of tough facial hair and sensitive skin, which puts me at a disadvantage when shaving. Skin irritation from shaving is very difficult to avoid and although various Panasonic electric shavers worked well for me in this regard, I always wanted a closer shave.

I tried to use 2-blade Gillette Sensor razors when I was a teenager and had to stop because of the skin irritation. Now, after decades of using electric shavers, I discovered that a close shave was within my grasp, if only I could do something about the resultant irritation. Electric shavers have other disadvantages in addition to lack of close shave: cleaning, charging, bulk and blades that would get dull after 1-2 years and require now screens and cutters that cost as much as a new shaver.

Just to illustrate this point: I recently used the following shavers: Panasonic ES8101S Electric Shaver, Panasonic Pro-Curve ES7037. The blades and screen combos for each were in $35 range, making it more practical to just get a new shaver. Bad for the environment.

After trying the manual Gillette Fusion and a battery-powered vibrating Gillette Fusion power razor, it was, to avoid irritation, a time to try something new. Or rather something old. The old-fashioned shaving with double-edge safety razor and blades. I bought the Parker 86R safety razor and 100 Shark Super Chrome double edge safety blades.

Normally, when you are new to double-edge safety razor shaving, it is recommended that you buy small numbers of different blade types and see which suits your skin and beard better. In this sense, buying 100 of the same blade type was a bit of a gamble. But the blades were super cheap and had excellent reviews.

About Shark Super Chrome

Shark Super Chrome double edge safety blades are blades that can be used in any double-edge safety razor. Razors are currently produced by Parker (India), Merkur (Germany) and quite a few other companies. The Shark blades reviewed here are stainless steel blades with polymer coating for smoothness and longevity.

Results

Shaving with a DE razor requires some learning (there are plenty of articles and videos online) and practice (don't expect great results at first). Still, the first time I tried these blades, I got a decent shave and less irritation than what I got shaving with Fusion. With every shave, I got better and after a few weeks I got very close shave with very minimal irritation, which is a perfect combination I tried to achieve. Less irritation than Fusion and closer shave than an electric shaver.

Another appealing aspect is the blades are cheap and last over a week each, even if shaving daily. They are light and are made entirely of metal, so environmental impact should be small. The Shark blades come in plastic cartridges (5 blades per). The cartridges have a blade disposal slot in the back, making blade disposal safer.

The math is simple: each blade costs about 12-16 cents and lasts over a week, resulting in cost of $5-8 per year. Fusion blades are over $2 each. Even if you manage to make one Fusion cartridge last 2 weeks, that works out to $60-80 per year. It is worse for the environment and I get skin irritation with Fusion. This is a no-brainer.

I use them in either Lord L6 razor and the excellent Edwin Jagger de89bl 3-piece razor.

Compared to Derby Extra Blades

I also got Derby Extra blades and they are quite different. Derby blades seem less sharp and Shark blades last longer. So these Shark blades are sharper and longer-lasting.

After using Derby blades it was a relief to go back to Shark Super Chrome. Shark blades produce less tugging, closer shave and longer life.

Compared to Astra Superior Platinum

I also got Astra Superior Platinum and although I liked them on first use, I was ultimately disappointed. Not only did Astra blades result in skin irritation on every single use, they also don't last as long as Shark and their packaging is frustrating to deal with.

After using Astra blades it was a relief to go back to Shark blades as well. Again, Shark blades produce less tugging, closer shave and longer life. I will try something else soon though.

Compared to Dorco ST-301.

The Dorco ST-301 blades seem duller and I much prefer Shark or Personna "blue" blades.

Compared to Wilkinson Sword Classic

The Shark Super Chrome are sharper and longer lasting than Wilkinson Sword Classic.

Pros: Low price, sharp, durable, smooth shave with virtually no irritation, blade disposal slot in case
Cons: None

Bottom Line

Both Gillette and Schick produce "shaving systems" with more and more blades. The results are not necessarily better. It was fortunate that I decided to give old-school shaving a try and I couldn't be happier. Although double-edge razor shaving requires practice and it does take a bit longer to shave with a DE than with Fusion, I get good shave with no irritation. I also find the shaving process more soothing, which makes me sleepy, which in turn makes it ideal after shower and right before going to bed.

DE shaving is also better for the environment as only the blade itself is disposed of and not the cartridge with its surrounding plastic, packaging, etc. Shark Super Chrome are sharp, stay sharp for over a week and provide excellent combination of cutting and smooth gliding over the skin. They are also significantly cheaper than Merkur and Feather blades. And they are sharper and longer lasting than Derby blades. The Shark cases come with a blade disposal slot and the quality of blades has been very uniform. I highly recommend them.

My web site

Astra Superior Platinum Double Edge Razor Blades Review

Three years ago I switched from Panasonic electric shavers to double-edge shaving, briefly trying Schick Hydro 3 Blade Razor, Schick Hydro 5 Blade Razor, Gillette Fusion, Gillette Fusion Power and Gillette Fusion ProGlide. I discovered that I could get a much better shave with cartridge systems, but with some skin irritation and at cartridge prices that I was not willing to pay. To get a better shave than what an electric shaver gave me but with less irritation, I started using double-edge (DE) safety razors and have used them with two blade kinds for two years: Shark Super Chrome blades and Derby Extra Double Edge Razor Blades.

I use a Parker 86R, Edwin Jagger De89bl and Lord L6 razors, along with a badger hair brush and shaving soap. Note that different skin and beard types respond better to different blades. In the first two years, I had best results with Shark. Shark Super Chrome blades are sharper than Derby, last longer and pull less. Then, I decided to try Astra blades. Although when I lived in Russia decades ago, people who used Russian-made Astra blades were constantly looking for better blades (from Finland or Sweden), the Astra blades are now completely different and are highly regarded on various shaving forums.

Later I tried a bunch of other blades, ultimately deciding that Personna "blue" blades were my blades of choice.

What is Astra Superior Premium Platinum Double Edge Razor Blade

The Astra Superior Premium Platinum Double Edge Safety Razor Blades are double-edge blades made of “highest quality steel”. They are made in Russia.

Convenience

I bought a 100-pack, which consists of 20 5-blade cardboard packs. Unlike Shark or Derby blades, that come in plastic 5-packs which can be used to safely dispose used blades, these don’t. So far I am using Derby and Shark intermittently and they fortunately fit more than 5 used blades so I can put some used Astras into them in addition to their own blades. Same with Dorco and Wilkinson Sword Classic: they come with plastic dispensers that can be used to dispose of the blades.

Additionally, Astra blades have some sticky substance on them that holds them in place on the waxed paper envelope they come in. Other blades I used up to this point used none or some substance that was not as sticky and remained on paper. To be fair, Gillette 7 O'clock Sharp Edge are made at the same factory and have the same sticky substance.

These Astra blades have this sticky stuff left on them in 4 places, and quite a lot of it, necessitating removal. I use the outer paper envelope the blade comes in to wipe off the stuff, and it takes only about 30 seconds, but it is annoying and pointless.

Performance 

Astra blades came a long way in the last 20 or so years. Originally, I was very impressed by these Astra blades, but now not so much. The first shave I got gave me an impression that the blade was very sharp and I got a very close shave. Then I discovered I had skin irritation.

I have delicate skin yet tough beard, which is a difficult combination when it comes to shaving. I got best results with Shark Super Chrome in the past and turned out Astra blades resulted in skin irritation, which I don't get with either Shark or Derby. Neither did I get this kind of skin irritation with Personna blades or Feather Hi-Stainless. Alternatively, if I shave only enough to get a decent (not very close) shave, there is little to no irritation. So when using this blade, I have to compromise.

1. Astra blades pull less than Derby or Shark Super Chrome on first use.
2. Astra blades pull very little when the beard is longer than a day old.
3. The Astra blade seems to glide over the skin as well as the Derby blade when the beard is 1 day or shorter
4. The longevity of Astra blades seems to be similar to Derby
5. Overall, Astra blades provide me with a close shave, but take longer time to shave than better blades and irritate my skin, while geting dull quicker.

The bottom line here is when the blade is new, it shaves very well, but produces skin irritation and after 1-2 uses, it starts pulling and leaves stubble behind. In the same use, razors and technique, Shark produces no irritation, results in a close shave and lasts much longer. Derby blade pulls more from the start and doesn't shave a closely as Shark, but it doesn't irritate my skin. And Personna is sharp, smooth, yet long-lasting.

Be mindful that the results depend on the type of the beard and skin. And interestingly some people rave about these Astra blades, so it is possibly that your beard, skin and razor will result in good shaves.

Value

At about 10 cents per blade, which lasts 1-2 shaves, these blades are much cheaper than Gillette Fusion, Schick Hydro 5 or Schick Hydro 3. They are better for environment too. And they are cheaper than Shark or Derby per unit, but not necessarily per shave.

A Better Blade From the Same Company

I also use the Gillette 7 O'clock Sharp Edge blades made by the same company in St. Petersubrg, Russia under license from Gillette and those are much better (albeit much more expensive). They are sharper and smoother, plus longer-lasting.

Another Better Blade

I also use US-made Personna Double Edge Razor Blades (a.k.a. "Lab Blue") and those are much better. Not only do they last me 6-8 shaves, they are sharp yet don't irritate my skin.

Pros: Cheap, decent shaving, no pulling even with longer beard on first use
Cons: Sticky substance on blades requires wiping, get dull quick, skin irritation, packed in cardboard

Bottom Line

For me, Astra Superior Premium Platinum Double Edge Safety Razor Blades don't work as well as either Derby, Personna, Gillette 7 O'clock Sharp Edge or Shark blades. In fact, these are so far the worst blades I have used. And while they are slightly cheaper per blade, they are more expensive per use. There are inconveniences in their packaging as well. I also tried Dorco ST301 and Feather, but overall Shark blades, Personna and Gillette 7 O'Clock Sharp Edge work best for me.


My web site

Personna Double Edge Blades - Much Better Than Astra, Derby, Fusion or ProGlide

Over two years ago I switched from Panasonic electric shavers to double-edge shaving, in the interim briefly trying Schick Hydro 3 Blade Razor, Schick Hydro 5 Blade Razor, Gillette Fusion, Gillette Fusion Power and Gillette Fusion ProGlide. I discovered that I could get a much better shave with cartridge systems, but with some skin irritation and at cartridge prices that I was not willing to pay. To get a better shave than what an electric shaver gave me but with less irritation, I started using double-edge (DE) safety razors and have been using them with two blade kinds: Shark Super Chrome blades and Derby Extra Double Edge Razor Blades, then went on a blade-shopping spree. As a result, I recently tried several other blades.

I mostly use the Lord L6 and Edwin Jagger De89bl razors with Parker 86R being on standby. I use a badger hair brush and shaving soap. Note that different skin and beard types respond better to different blades and the combination of the razor with the blade matters as well. Lord L6 is pretty mild razor and I tend to get best results with sharp blades. I had good results with Shark. Shark Super Chrome blades are sharper than Derby, last longer and pull less. I then tried Astra Superior Platinum blades, which in my case turned out to be Inferior. Despite being highly regarded on various shaving forums, they proved to be the worst for my skin/beard type in my razors. Irritation, tugging and pulling and poor packaging were noted.

I then tried Gillette 7 O’clock Sharp Edge, which were very sharp but lasted only 3-4 shaves. And finally, it was Personna’s turn.

What is Personna Double Edge Razor Blade

The Personna Double Edge Razor Blades are double-edge blades. Some of them are made it the US, some in Israel. I am reviewing here the ones that are called “Lab Blue”. They are the blades made in the US and come in blue packaging.

Convenience

Unlike Astra and 7 O’clock and, to a smaller extent, Derby and Shark, these blades have no glue on them whatsoever, which is nice.

Performance 

I was shocked at the performance delivered by these blades. They are not expensive, yet for me they outperformed all the blades I tried so far, with the exception being Gillette 7 O’clock and the Feather Hi Stainless, which are sharper, but don’t last as long as Personna.

I have delicate skin yet tough beard, which is a difficult combination when it comes to shaving. I find that the mild Lord L6 razor with a sharp blade works great.

1. Personna blades pull less than Derby or Shark Super Chrome and less than Astra from second use on.
2. Personna blades pull very little when the beard is longer than a day old.
3. The Personna blade seems to glide over the skin as well as the Derby blade when the beard is 1 day or shorter
4. The longevity of Personna blades seems to exceed even Shark and far surpass Astra. I get at least 6-7 shaves (3 passes each) from Personna, whereas I got 2 from Astra, 3-4 from Gillette 7 O’clock, 4-5 from Derby and 5-6 from Shark Super Chrome.
5. Overall, Personna blades provide me with a close shave, with no irritation and last a long time.

The bottom line is this blade produces close shave with no irritation and last me a week each (one 3-pass shave per day).

Be mindful that the results depend on the type of the beard and skin.

Value

I bought 100 of these for $13. At about 13-20 cents per blade, which lasts 6-7 shaves, these blades are not only much cheaper than Gillette Fusion, Schick Hydro 5 or Schick Hydro 3, they are cheaper per use than Astra, Gillette 7 O’clock Sharp Edge and even slightly cheaper than Shark.

They are better for environment too since I only discard one small piece of metal every week.


Pros: Sharp, smooth, long-lasting, inexpensive, no glue on blade
Cons: Not the very sharpest (but close)

Bottom Line

For me, Personna Double Edge Razor Blades work better than Derby, Astra, Gillette 7 O'clock Sharp Edge or Shark blades. See my reviews of Dorco ST301, Wilkinson Sword Classic and Feather Hi-Stainless, but these Personna  blades are almost as sharp as the sharpest Gillette 7 O’clock Sharp Edge and Feather yet cost less and last longer.

My web site

Wilkinson Sword Classic Double Edge Razor Blade - Sharp Enough and Smooth Enough

After using various electric shavers for over 10 years, I switched to double-edge safety razor shaving, briefly trying Schick Hydro 3 Blade Razor, Schick Hydro 5 Blade Razor, Gillette Fusion, Gillette Fusion Power and Gillette Fusion ProGlide in the interim. That switchover happened over two years ago. Double-edge shaving gives me a closer shave than that with an electric shaver but with less irritation than cartridge systems. After using Shark Super Chrome blades and Derby Extra Double Edge Razor Blades, I tried a variety of different blades, last of which was Wilkinson Sword Classic blades made in Germany.

I mostly use the Lord L6 and Edwin Jagger De89bl 3-piece razors with a TTO Parker 86R being on standby. I use a badger hair brush and shaving soap for prep and an alum block, witch hazel and after-shave lotion after the shave.

Note that different skin and beard types respond better to different blades and the combination of the razor with the blade matters as well. Lord L6 is pretty mild razor and I tend to get best results with sharp blades. I had good results with Shark. Shark Super Chrome blades are sharper than Derby, last longer and pull less. I then tried Astra Superior Platinum, which in my case turned out to be Inferior rather than Superior. Despite being highly regarded on various shaving forums, they proved to be the worst for my skin/beard type in my razors. Irritation, tugging and pulling and poor packaging were noted.

I then tried Gillette 7 O’clock Sharp Edge, which were very sharp but lasted only 3-4 shaves. Then I tried Personna blades, which were excellent, providing a close shave, no irritation and lasting for 6-8 shaves. Next were Dorco ST-301, which turned out to be too dull for me. Finally, I tried the Wilkinson Sword and the Feather Hi-Stainless.

What is Wilkinson Sword Classic Double Edge Razor Blade

The Wilkinson Sword Classic blades are stainless-steel double-edge blades made in Germany. The edge is triple-coated: with chromium to resist corrosion, ceramic for durability and PTFE for less irritation.

Convenience

Unlike Astra and 7 O’clock and, to a smaller extent, Derby and Shark, these blades have no glue on them, which is nice. They come in a sturdy plastic dispenser.

Performance

After using Dorco ST-301, these blades were a relief. They are sharper than Dorco and resulted in a closer shave with less pulling. Although they don’t shave as well as either Personna or Gilletter 7 O’clock Sharp Edge, neither do they cost as much (depending where you buy them).

I have delicate skin yet tough beard, which is a difficult combination when it comes to shaving. I find that the mild Lord L6 razor with a sharp blade works great.

1. These Wilkinson blades pull less than Derby or Dorco.
2. These blades pull very little when the beard is longer than a day old.
3. The longevity of these blades seems to exceed both Dorco and Astra. I will update this review once I complete the test of a couple of these in my razors.
4. Overall, Wilkinson Sword Classic blades provide me with a rather close shave, with little irritation.

The bottom line is this blade produces close enough shave with little irritation.

Be mindful that the results depend on the type of the beard and skin.

Value

I bought 10 of these for $2.6 delivered. Not the cheapest, but less than the similar number of better blades such as Gillette 7 O’clock Sharp Edge. Of course, these blades are much cheaper than Gillette Fusion, Schick Hydro 5 or Schick Hydro 3. Try them and see if they suit your razors and skin/beard.

Pros: Rather close shave, little irritation, widely available, inexpensive
Cons: Not as sharp as Personna or Gillette 7 O'clock Sharp Edge

Bottom Line

These blades work well enough, providing relatively close and low-irritation shave. But for me, Personna, Gillette 7 O'clock Sharp Edge and Shark blades work better.

My web site

Feather Hi-Stainless Double Edge Blade - The Sharpest Blade Ever

Feather Hi-stainless Double Edge Razor Blades are considered to be the sharpest. I have used a dozen or so different blades and I have to agree. But does it mean they are the best?

The Background 

After using various electric shavers for over 10 years, I switched to double-edge safety razor shaving, briefly trying Schick Hydro 3 Blade Razor, Schick Hydro 5 Blade Razor, Gillette Fusion, Gillette Fusion Power and Gillette Fusion ProGlide in the interim. That switchover happened over two years ago. Double-edge shaving gives me a closer shave than that with an electric shaver but with less irritation than cartridge systems.

After using Shark Super Chrome blades and Derby Extra Double Edge Razor Blades, I tried a variety of different blades, last of which were Feather Hi-Stainless blades made in Japan.

I mostly use the Lord L6 and Edwin Jagger De89bl 3-piece razors. I use a badger hair brush and shaving soap for prep and an alum block, witch hazel and after-shave lotion after the shave.

Note that different skin and beard types respond better to different blades and the combination of the razor with the blade matters as well. Lord L6 is pretty mild razor and I tend to get best results with sharp blades. I had good results with Shark. Shark Super Chrome blades are sharper than Derby, last longer and pull less. I then tried Astra Superior Platinum, which in my case turned out to be Inferior rather than Superior.

Despite being highly regarded on various shaving forums, they proved to be the worst for my skin/beard type in my razors. Irritation, tugging and pulling and poor packaging were noted.

I then tried Gillette 7 O’clock Sharp Edge, which were very sharp but lasted only 3-4 shaves. Then I tried Personna blades, which were excellent, providing a close shave, no irritation and lasting for 6-8 shaves. Next were Dorco ST-301, which turned out to be too dull for me. The German Wilkinson Sword blades were adequate, but not sharp enough and lasted only 3 shaves. And now is the Feather’s turn.

What is Feather Hi-Stainless Double Edge Razor Blade

The Feather Hi-Stainless blades are stainless-steel double-edge blades made in Japan. Considered the sharpest of all double-edge blades, they are generally either loved or hated and never in between. They are frequently feared and respected. It is common knowledge that you have to pay attention when you shave with these or blood might result.

Convenience

Unlike Astra and 7 O’clock, these blades have little glue on them. They come in a sturdy plastic dispenser in packs of five blades.

Performance 

Indeed, these are the sharpest blades I have used. You have to pay close attention when shaving with these, in other words you have to apply no pressure, use the correct angle and account for the direction of the beard growth.

They are noticeably sharper than Astra Superior Platinum, Derby Extra Double Edge Razor Blades and much sharper than Dorco ST-301 or German-made Wilkinson Sword Classic.

I have sensitive skin and tough beard. Interestingly, most people new to wet shaving describe their skin as sensitive and beard as tough. But regardless, I find that the sharper the blade the better it works for me and I still need 3 passes to get to BBS or DFS (baby-butt smooth or damn fine shave). However, with the Feather, I can get DFS is 2 passes instead of 3, if Feather is used on regular basis. That is in the Lord L6 mild razor as well as in the Edwin Jagger De89bl medium razor.

In Edwin Jagger De89bl, 1.5-day growth is easily removed in one pass, with 2 passes achieving DFS with no nicks, irritation or any other issues.

That said, the Feather blade is not without issues. It is so sharp that it does exfoliate the skin pretty well (if used daily or twice a day) and the alum block or witch hazel stings quite a bit after using it, but not worse than when I used Astra Superior Platinum, which didn’t shave nearly as well. It lasts 5-6 shaves, which is pretty good. However, at $0.40-0.50 per blade it is still only $0.06-0.10 per shave.

The biggest issue for me is there are at least two other blades that I prefer better and they cost less as well. Gillette 7 o’clock Sharp Edge is virtually as sharp as Feather, yet more smooth and forgiving, lasts about the same and costs $0.25 per blade if bought in bulk.

But the best for me are Personna blades, which are only $0.13-0.20 per blade, yet almost as sharp, much smoother and more forgiving, while lasting 6-8 shaves. Not only that is only $0.02-0.03 per shave, more importantly I don’t need to disassemble the razor as frequently and at the same time I can skip applying witch hazel to my face. The result is smooth shave in about the same time (3 passes instead of 2, but skipping the witch hazel application) for less money.

To summarize: 

1. These Feather blades are the sharpest in business, period.
2. These blades are unforgiving so you have to be really careful when shaving with them
3. They provide very close shave and you may be able to shave faster with them than with other blades, e.g. I do 2 passes instead of 3
4. They last the average number of shaves before getting dull
5. They are expensive per blade (although only $0.06-0.10 per shave, which is much cheaper than shaving with cartridges anyway).

Be mindful that the results depend on the type of the beard and skin.

Value

These are the sharpest blades and if they work well for you, they won’t be very expensive per shave. My cost per shave is $0.06-0.10 whereas Personna blades result in $0.02-0.03 per shave.

Pros: You won't find a blade that is sharper; provides fast and close shave
Cons: Somewhat expensive, requires respect and attention when shaving, other choices work almost as well

Bottom Line

These Feather Hi-stainless Double Edge Razor Blades are the sharpest so treat them with respect. They provide me with smoothest, fastest shave, but I found that Personna blades that work as well or better for less money and with less skin removal. Try these Feathers, they might work well for you.


My web site

Dorco Stailness Platinum Double Edge Blades ST-301 - Cheap and Good in a Correct Razor

Having used safety razors with double edge blades for over two years, I recently decided to try a bunch of new (to me) blades. I briefly used Schick Hydro 3 Blade Razor, Schick Hydro 5 Blade Razor, Gillette Fusion, Gillette Fusion Power and Gillette Fusion ProGlide in the past. While doing so, I discovered that I could get a much better shave with cartridge systems than with various Panasonic electric shavers, but with some skin irritation and at cartridge prices that I was not willing to pay. To get a better shave than what an electric shaver gave me but with less irritation, I started using double-edge (DE) safety razors and have been using them with mostly with Shark Super Chrome blades and Derby Extra Double Edge Razor Blades.

I mostly use the mild Lord L6 and moderate Edwin Jagger De89bl razors. I use a badger hair brush and shaving soap. Note that different skin and beard types respond better to different blades and the combination of the razor with the blade matters as well. Lord L6 is pretty mild razor and I tend to get best results with sharp blades. I had good results with Shark Super Chrome blades in the past, but lately got even better results with Personna and Gillette 7 O’clock Sharp Edge blades.

I was unimpressed with Astra Superior Platinum, and now it is the turn of Dorco Platinum ST-301.

What is Dorco Stainless Platinum ST-301 Double Edge Razor Blade

The Dorco blades are made in Korea. They are double-edge stainless steel blades. The blades I got come in 10-blade plastic dispensers with a used blade disposal slot. They are single-wrapped with no sign of glue.

Convenience

Unlike Astra and 7 O’clock and, to a smaller extent, Derby and Shark, these blades have no glue on them whatsoever, which is nice.

Performance 

After excellent Personna blades that lasted me 6-8 shaves and provided smooth and lose shave, these Dorco blades were disappointing at first. Although they are moderately smooth, they seemed to be the dullest blade I have tried so far in the mild Lord L6. The first blade loaded into the L6 pulled and was barely usable. However when I loaded another blade into a more aggressive Edwin Jagger De89bl razor, the results improved dramatically. In the EJ these feel like a smooth (albeit not very sharp) blads that resulted in a close shave with virtually no irritation.

I have delicate skin yet tough beard, which is a difficult combination when it comes to shaving. I find that the mild Lord L6 razor with a sharp blade works great. But this Dorco, while didn't work well in a mild razor, worked well in a more aggressive EJ.

1. In a mild razor, Dorco blades pull more than most blades I used so far, especially after the first use.  In a more aggressive razor, they are smooth and feel moderately sharp.
2. Due to the aforementioned, I couldn’t use the Dorco for more than 3 shaves in the L6 and actually prefer not to use them for over one shave at most. In contrast, I get at least 6-8 shaves (3 passes each) from Personna, 1-2 from Astra, 4-5 from Gillette 7 O’clock, 4-5 from Derby Extra Double Edge Razor Blades and 5-6 from Shark Super Chrome blades. But in the Edwin Jagger De89bl this blade lasted several shaves.
3. Overall, Dorco blades turned out to be almost unusable for me in the L6 and quite pleasant in the EJ.

Be mindful that the results depend on the type of the beard and skin.

Value

You can buy 100 of these for less than 10 dollars. If they work for your skin/beard type, it is an excellent deal. Some people find this blade to be perfect in a moderately aggressive razor, such as Edwin Jagger De89bl and I concur that these Dorcos work well in the EJ.

Pros: Cheap, no glue, good dispenser, work well in a more aggressive razor
Cons: Too dull to be used in a mild razor, need aggressive razor to shine

Bottom Line 

For me, Dorco Stainless Steel Razor Blades ST-301 didn’t work well in a mild razor, but worked well in the more aggressive Edwin Jagger De89bl. Moderately smooth, they are not very sharp. I still find that Personna Double Edge Razor Blades are much better, for not much more money. They are sharper and last much longer. But in a moderately aggressive razor, the Dorco ST301 work really well.

Next up is the review of the Japanese Feather Hi-Stainless blades, considered to be sharpest blades in existence.

My web site

Microsoft Zune Premium Headphones (Model JDA00001) - Excellent After Burn-In

When I saw a good deal on Microsoft Zune Premium headphones (model JDA00001), I decided to get them. They had universally good reviews anywhere I checked and the deal was just too good to pass. It just so happened that I received the JDA00001 right after I started reviewing the new Pineapple Rumble K Bone Conduction Headphones as well as the water-proof Pineapple Rumble KW model.

I have a lot of headphones at home, most inexpensive and not all are being used. Some of the examples in my "collection" includes headphones such as Sennheiser HD201, Sennheiser HD202, Koss KSC75, Koss SparkPlug, Philips HS500, Creative EP-640, and others. The headphones I use most frequently are Sennheiser HD202 (when using my rowing machine), Koss KSC75 (most favorite overall, used when no noise insulation is needed), and Creative EP-640 (when compactness and noise insulation is needed). The Zune Premium headphone is a competitor to the latter. It provides compact, noise-insulating design.

What Is Microsoft Zune Premium Headphone (Model JDA00001)?

The Microsoft Zune Premium Headphones are an in-ear noise-insulating headphones with soft fabric cable of unique look and feel. The silicone rubber ear buds provide a secure fit and good sound insulation (in addition to the ear buds installed on the headphone, three extra sets of different sizes are included).

The headphones look stylish and solidly built. Also included is an earphone clip for making sure the cable is not too long for your application and a soft (suede-looking and feeling material) with magnetic closure.

Some specs from the manual (for some reason I was unable to find them anywhere online): 20-15,000 Hz frequency response at +/- 6 dB, impedance of 16 Ohms +/- 15% at 1 kHz, sensitivity of 96 dB SPL +/- 3 dB @ 1 mW, 1 kHz, 4.6-feet (1.4 m) cord with a 3.5-mm compact plug for use with portable gear.

Performance 

Once the headphones arrived, I immediately read the manual, was disappointed at the 15,000-Hz upper range of frequency response at +/- 6 dB, listened to some music and was disappointed at the harsh treble quality. Since I know this is something that improves most with burn-in, I plugged the JDA00001 into my iPod connected to the AC jack with a power adaptor, and played random rock music for 47 hours straight.

In the meantime, I was snickering thinking about how I am going to write a review about "premium" headphone with a "premium" look and feel, but not so premium sound. Tonight, I got back from work and listened to some music. Immediately I realized that I will not be able to say much negative about them. The treble improved and so did the detail level.

The headphones are solidly built, have impeccable fit and finish and look stylish. The outer parts of the headphones are magnetized and flat and thus can be connected together, reducing clutter. The supplied earphone clip is an excellent idea and makes one wonder why nobody has thought about it before (at least among mainstream manufacturers). The pouch is lightweight, looks "premium" and is convenient to use.

The jack is compact, which lets me connect it to my iPod while it is charging, something that is difficult to do with the Koss KSC75's large plastic molding around the plug. The silicone ear buds fit very well, insulate sound superbly and the supplied replacement might come in handy. The lack of ports in headphones further contributes to sound insulation and tighter bass.

Speaking of which, these headphones have plenty of bass, even more so than the Creative EP-640. Yet, it is not overpowering and the rest of the spectrum does not suffer. And the high sensitivity allows you use lower volume on your portable gear and still get loud enough sound.

Sound

I have played a variety of music through the Zune Premium, including classical, Euro-dance, pop, rock, electronic music and rap. I also listened to movie soundtracks. I used my iPod, a portable CD player and a laptop as well as my Panasonic SA-XR57 receiver's headphone out (fed from CD as well as DVD-Audio). For comparison purposes, I also alternated between the over-the-ear Koss KSC75 and the in-ear Creative EP-640 headphones.

After a quick check with some rock music, I started listening to Aram Khachaturian's Violin Concerto in D Minor. Surprisingly, the sound was more balanced than my current preferred headphones: the in-ear Creative EP-640 and over-the-ear Koss KSC75. The Zune Premium has more bass and warmer sound than the either. Although the Koss sounded a bit more detailed, especially in upper frequency ranges, after listening to this JDA00001 it definitely lacked bass. And I don't even like music with a lot of bass!

The sound was transparent and detailed with clear instrument separation and only minor congestion in some frequency areas.

It was also apparent that the JDA00001 had higher sensitivity than either and much higher than that of the Pineapple Rumble K Bone Conduction Headphones as well as the water-proof Pineapple Rumble KW. The high sensitivity usually doesn't mean good sound, but this is an exception to the rule. I used my iPod at about 50% of its volume, whereas other headphones required 10-15% more. The Zune Premium sounded good at low volumes and high volumes alike.

I also used my Panasonic SA-XR57 receiver's headphone jack and played a variety of music. Percussion music sounded excellent as did electronic and rap (which I generally don't listen to).

While alternating the headphones between this Zune Premium, the Koss KSC75 and the Creative EP-640, I noticed that I started to prefer the Zune Premium most of the time. And I was going to throw them into a "never to be seen" drawer!

Apparently, the burn-in is a must with these (and many other) headphones. Just play your favorite music at moderate volume for 40-50 hours and then enjoy.

What Is Not "Premium" Then?

I can actually find little to complain. One item is the fact that the "premium", stylish cable creates noise when you move your head, especially if you have facial stubble. Nothing too objectionable.

Pros: Good build quality, looks, features, comfort, bass, detailed and warm sound, price
Cons: Needs burn-in to sound its best (don't judge it before 40 hours of playback)

Bottom Line 

The Microsoft Zune Premium Headphones JDA00001 is an unexpectedly excellent headphone with rich, detailed and warm sound. It doesn't lack bass, provides excellent sound insulation and comfort and looks "premium". It has high sensitivity, is well built and thoughtfully made. Just make sure you burn it in before use.

And if you need larger, enclosed headphones, check out my Creative Aurvana Live! review.

Norpro Meat Grinder, Mincer, and Pasta Maker - A Plasic Meat Grinder?

I was initially reluctant to buy the Norpro Meat Grinder, Mincer, and Pasta Maker. My wife wanted a meat grinder and after figuring out that we didn't want to get an electric one (due to cost, complexity, counter space, convenience, durability and safety issues) I started looking at different kinds of manual grinders online.

Most were of conventional type: made of metal and needing a table lid to be attached to. That would be problematic since we wanted to use it on the marble countertop and there wasn't enough lip to it to attach such a device. Plus damaging the countertop would not be cool.

Then I saw the this Norpro Meat Grinder, etc. Made of plastic and employing a large suction cup it seemed a good solution to the above issue, albeit the plastic build was questionable in terms of durability. But the reviews I saw were mostly glowing and much more positive overall than the ones of the metal, conventional models.

I went ahead and bought it. Upon arrival, the assembly required was minimal. Ditto the disassembly and washing. The manual is small but the use is self-explanatory and the pictures on sides of the box it came in provide excellent information on locking/unlocking the suction cup.


Performance

The suction cup on the base works surprisingly well and holds the device in place securely. The supplied key is similar to a little plastic wrench and helps you rotate the lock/unlock knob for the suction cup. But I was able to rotate it by hand, without the key also.

The plastic construction was suspicious at first because even the feeding screw is plastic. The only metal parts are the cutting mechanism, the two pins in the plastic feeding screw that hold the cutter and the plate with holes as well as the crank. Surprisingly, when we started grinding beef, the effort required was much less than I expected (remembering how much effort I had to apply when I used an old-school metal manual grinder) and the whole plastic-fantastic device worked superbly.


The meat we used was USDA Choice top sirloin, so there was no tendon involved, but still the ease of use was unparalleled. And due to having transparent top part, we were able to see what was going on inside, which is not necessary, but interesting.

Lately we have been eating grass-fed beef only (on a paleo diet) and although I have no hesitation buying grass-fed ground beef, being able to grind your own has been convenient and is probably still safer.

After the use, the disassembly and washing was very easy. And it looks to be well build and therefore at least moderately durable. Will it last virtually forever like an all-metal model? Probably not, but we are not planning on using it every day either and with occasional use I suspect it will serve us for many years.

Accessories

The device comes with a sausage funnel attachment, pasta and linguini attachments, the aforementioned plastic locking key and two metal "output" plates with holes of a different sizes.

Pros: Compact, light, easy to use and take apart, suction cup, accessories, sharp cutting mechanism
Cons: Questionable durability in heavy use (note: it held up fine in my use)

Bottom Line

The Norpro Meat Grinder, Mincer, and Pasta Maker is an inexpensive, light, compact and easy to use device. I highly recommend it if you want a meat grinder with a suction cup attachment.